Doesn’t this mean that they should have smaller classes?

The NY Times is running an article on the upcoming challenge to Florida’s controversial voucher system for student education. There seems to be a point that’s been overlooked.

The article highlights the story of one school, Edison High, which had been a really crap school by all accounts. The voucher system allowed students to “escape”, by transferring to a different school (including private schools that offer low-cost education – i.e. religious schools). This has had the effect of lowering class sizes from a student-teacher ratio of about 30:1 to only 22:1. At the same time, Edison has had a lot of teachers replaced by a dynamic new principal.

So… a “failing” school was fixed by lowering class sizes and replacing ineffective teachers. You know, that sounds like a recipe for fixing all failing schools!

An argument can be made for voucher-based education (which allows a student to transfer out of the public school system to the private sector, with some taxpayer subsidy that is usually less than the cost of education under the public system). However, it should be around choice. Using vouchers, or any other “voluntary transfer” system, to allow students to “escape” a bad school misses the point: you still need to fix the bad school. If students should be allowed to “escape” bad schools, why not just shut bad schools down? That way, they can all escape, right?

Author: Robert Watkins

My name is Robert Watkins. I am a software developer and have been for over 20 years now. I currently work for people, but my opinions here are in no way endorsed by them (which is cool; their opinions aren’t endorsed by me either). My main professional interests are in Java development, using Agile methods, with a historical focus on building web based applications. I’m also a Mac-fan and love my iPhone, which I’m currently learning how to code for. I live and work in Brisbane, Australia, but I grew up in the Northern Territory, and still find Brisbane too cold (after 22 years here). I’m married, with two children and one cat. My politics are socialist in tendency, my religious affiliation is atheist (aka “none of the above”), my attitude is condescending and my moral standing is lying down.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: