<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Software is too expensive to build cheaply... &#187; javaworld</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twasink.net/blog/tags/javaworld/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twasink.net/blog</link>
	<description>Robert's Rambling Ruminations Regarding Reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 06:57:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Adding unit tests to a J2EE application</title>
		<link>http://twasink.net/blog/2004/03/adding-unit-tests-to-a-j2ee-application/</link>
		<comments>http://twasink.net/blog/2004/03/adding-unit-tests-to-a-j2ee-application/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2004 06:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ejb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j2ee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javaworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twasink.net/wp/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got asked a very simple question today: how do you go about adding unit tests to an already existing J2EE app? In particular, so you can test your logic standalone, without needing to go through a deployment cycle and test it in the server?

My interlocutor made the very good point that when you develop [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twasink.net/blog/2004/03/adding-unit-tests-to-a-j2ee-application/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Examples for &#8220;More on getters and setters&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://twasink.net/blog/2004/01/examples-for-more-on-getters-and-setters/</link>
		<comments>http://twasink.net/blog/2004/01/examples-for-more-on-getters-and-setters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 05:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[builder pattern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encapsulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holub]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javaworld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twasink.net/wp/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the request of a reader, I&#8217;ve decided to post some examples on how something like the Employee class described in Allen Holub&#8217;s article More on getters and setters could evolve. This may not be the only way, but it certainly is one way.

Let&#8217;s start with a simple example: an Employee domain object, an EmployeeForm [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twasink.net/blog/2004/01/examples-for-more-on-getters-and-setters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on &#8220;More on getters and setters&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://twasink.net/blog/2004/01/more-on-more-on-getters-and-setters/</link>
		<comments>http://twasink.net/blog/2004/01/more-on-more-on-getters-and-setters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[builder pattern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encapsulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holub]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javaworld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twasink.net/wp/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allen Holub wrote an article in Javaworld recently entitled More on getters and setters Oh boy, has this article caused some fuss in places.

think what a lot of objections have come about because people don&#8217;t really understand Holub&#8217;s point. In particular, they don&#8217;t understand why accessors and mutators are bad for domain objects. The reason, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://twasink.net/blog/2004/01/more-on-more-on-getters-and-setters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
