« XML, java.io, and the Composite Pattern | Main | I'm sorry, I can't believe this one... »
From the JUnit mailing list, courtesy of J.B "JUnit Recipies" Rainsberger
JBR's postulate 1. For every testable design that requires exposing elements "just for testing", there exists an equivalent testable design that does not require exposing elements "just for testing".
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 2, 2005 7:22 AM.
The previous post in this blog was XML, java.io, and the Composite Pattern.
The next post in this blog is I'm sorry, I can't believe this one....
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
