<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The rumours of Ruby&#8217;s death are greatly exaggerated&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twasink.net/blog/2007/05/the-rumours-of-rubys-death-are-greatly-exaggerated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twasink.net/blog/2007/05/the-rumours-of-rubys-death-are-greatly-exaggerated/</link>
	<description>Robert's Rambling Ruminations Regarding Reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:02:46 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan Brown</title>
		<link>http://twasink.net/blog/2007/05/the-rumours-of-rubys-death-are-greatly-exaggerated/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 09:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twasink.net/wp/?p=211#comment-388</guid>
		<description>So the number of instances of the word &quot;Ruby&quot; in a programming context have gone down.  So people are saying &quot;Rails&quot; instead of &quot;Ruby on Rails&quot;.  Big deal.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the number of instances of the word &#8220;Ruby&#8221; in a programming context have gone down.  So people are saying &#8220;Rails&#8221; instead of &#8220;Ruby on Rails&#8221;.  Big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Watkins</title>
		<link>http://twasink.net/blog/2007/05/the-rumours-of-rubys-death-are-greatly-exaggerated/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Watkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twasink.net/wp/?p=211#comment-387</guid>
		<description>Michele - Exactly. &quot;Stagnation&quot; is an odd term for a language that jumped up so massively in the last 12 months. Furthermore, the TIOBE index is used to _very_ large fluctuations - see the hit to Java that occurred in 2004, simply because Google changed their search methodology. The month-to-month fluctuations are also high. That&#039;s why the TIOBE index can not be taken seriously on a month-to-month basis. It&#039;s good for trend analysis, and the trend shows that Ruby was the ONLY language to get an absolute boost of over 2% in its market share in the last twelve months; all of the top guns dropped massively.

Like I said, people need to learn to read the stats, not read into the stats.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michele &#8211; Exactly. &#8220;Stagnation&#8221; is an odd term for a language that jumped up so massively in the last 12 months. Furthermore, the TIOBE index is used to _very_ large fluctuations &#8211; see the hit to Java that occurred in 2004, simply because Google changed their search methodology. The month-to-month fluctuations are also high. That&#8217;s why the TIOBE index can not be taken seriously on a month-to-month basis. It&#8217;s good for trend analysis, and the trend shows that Ruby was the ONLY language to get an absolute boost of over 2% in its market share in the last twelve months; all of the top guns dropped massively.</p>
<p>Like I said, people need to learn to read the stats, not read into the stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele Bassani</title>
		<link>http://twasink.net/blog/2007/05/the-rumours-of-rubys-death-are-greatly-exaggerated/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele Bassani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 02:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twasink.net/wp/?p=211#comment-386</guid>
		<description>So, based on TIOBE index I can say that Python is died in 2004 and PHP&#039;s popularity falls every two months... but they are still growing. Maybe someone that tried Ruby in the last months has found it not matching their needs, but I think that it&#039;s natural to have some fluctuations in case of great expansion of a popularity of a programming language.
Sorry for my English.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, based on TIOBE index I can say that Python is died in 2004 and PHP&#8217;s popularity falls every two months&#8230; but they are still growing. Maybe someone that tried Ruby in the last months has found it not matching their needs, but I think that it&#8217;s natural to have some fluctuations in case of great expansion of a popularity of a programming language.<br />
Sorry for my English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x</title>
		<link>http://twasink.net/blog/2007/05/the-rumours-of-rubys-death-are-greatly-exaggerated/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 00:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twasink.net/wp/?p=211#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Nobody said anything about Ruby&#039;s death, they&#039;re just talking about Ruby hitting the top of its popularity.  Since the TIOBE results are confirmed by search jobs, I think these figures are really telling us something.

Also, a language that is -- according to its advocates -- taking the world by storm would never hit such a plateau so early.  Java never did, nor did C++.

Finally, the Ruby advocates were the first ones to point to TIOBE numbers when these were going up to show how popular their language is, so it&#039;s ironic that they no longer like that index when it&#039;s not supporting their story...

Anyway, I love Ruby and Ruby on Rails, but it&#039;s pretty clear to me that it&#039;s not going to take over anything.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody said anything about Ruby&#8217;s death, they&#8217;re just talking about Ruby hitting the top of its popularity.  Since the TIOBE results are confirmed by search jobs, I think these figures are really telling us something.</p>
<p>Also, a language that is &#8212; according to its advocates &#8212; taking the world by storm would never hit such a plateau so early.  Java never did, nor did C++.</p>
<p>Finally, the Ruby advocates were the first ones to point to TIOBE numbers when these were going up to show how popular their language is, so it&#8217;s ironic that they no longer like that index when it&#8217;s not supporting their story&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, I love Ruby and Ruby on Rails, but it&#8217;s pretty clear to me that it&#8217;s not going to take over anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
