<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interfaces are interesting&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twasink.net/blog/2005/06/interfaces-are-interesting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twasink.net/blog/2005/06/interfaces-are-interesting/</link>
	<description>Robert's Rambling Ruminations Regarding Reality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:02:46 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jem</title>
		<link>http://twasink.net/blog/2005/06/interfaces-are-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Jem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twasink.net/wp/?p=148#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Actually, *now* I know what you mean. If the compile-time parameter was of the downcast type ICM, then the IMCM parameter method would not be called. Thanks Rob for setting me straight. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, *now* I know what you mean. If the compile-time parameter was of the downcast type ICM, then the IMCM parameter method would not be called. Thanks Rob for setting me straight. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jem</title>
		<link>http://twasink.net/blog/2005/06/interfaces-are-interesting/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twasink.net/wp/?p=148#comment-229</guid>
		<description>It took me a minute or two to see what you mean. Cedric&#039;s sample makes a runtime check for an inheritance relationship between ICM and IMCM, whereas I presume the relationship at compile time. It is something I should know at compile time. I compile based on the knowledge of inheritance relationships all the time. Either way, its a dreadfully smelly sample. I like your assertion of the Ask-Don&#039;t-Tell principle.

As a coffee aficionado I also whole-heartedly approve of the milk-first (water-last) principle. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took me a minute or two to see what you mean. Cedric&#8217;s sample makes a runtime check for an inheritance relationship between ICM and IMCM, whereas I presume the relationship at compile time. It is something I should know at compile time. I compile based on the knowledge of inheritance relationships all the time. Either way, its a dreadfully smelly sample. I like your assertion of the Ask-Don&#8217;t-Tell principle.</p>
<p>As a coffee aficionado I also whole-heartedly approve of the milk-first (water-last) principle. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
