<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Agile &#8211; it&#8217;s not about the tools you use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twasink.net/2011/08/31/agile-its-not-about-the-tools-you-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twasink.net/2011/08/31/agile-its-not-about-the-tools-you-use/</link>
	<description>Robert&#039;s Rambling Ruminations Regarding Reality...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 16:31:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Ihle</title>
		<link>http://twasink.net/2011/08/31/agile-its-not-about-the-tools-you-use/#comment-483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Ihle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twasink.net/blog/?p=742#comment-483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the mention :-)

It really does comes down to the ability to adapt the process depending on the team, the company, the project and even the iteration. I see being able to adapt as (partly) a function of transparency (i.e. informational openness), and empowerment.

It&#039;s interesting to map the way companies view &#039;agility&#039; w.r.t. the dreyfus model --  quite often many seem to get stuck at the first step, i.e. &quot;rigid adherence to taught rules or plans and no exercise of discretionary judgment&quot;, which is perhaps where thinking along the lines of &quot;We use tool / technique X, therefore we&#039;re agile&quot; comes from.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It really does comes down to the ability to adapt the process depending on the team, the company, the project and even the iteration. I see being able to adapt as (partly) a function of transparency (i.e. informational openness), and empowerment.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting to map the way companies view &#8216;agility&#8217; w.r.t. the dreyfus model &#8212;  quite often many seem to get stuck at the first step, i.e. &#8220;rigid adherence to taught rules or plans and no exercise of discretionary judgment&#8221;, which is perhaps where thinking along the lines of &#8220;We use tool / technique X, therefore we&#8217;re agile&#8221; comes from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

